Women Workers in the British Industrial Revolution. Joyce Burnette, Wabash College. Historians disagree about whether the British Industrial Revolution (1. Frederick Engels, writing in the late nineteenth century, thought that the Industrial Revolution increased women’s participation in labor outside the home, and claimed that this change was emancipating. More recent historians dispute the claim that women’s labor force participation rose, and focus more on the disadvantages women experienced during this time period. One thing is certain: the Industrial Revolution was a time of important changes in the way that women worked. Directory Extracts for Jackson and associated families SWINNEY'S BIRMINGHAM DIRECTORY 1774 PEARSON & ROLLASON BIRMINGHAM DIRECTORY 1780 BIRMINGHAM DIRECTORY 1797. The following are notable people who were either born, raised or have lived for a significant period of time in the U.S. Military/war The Texas. Ethnic/National ancestry of Catherine Elizabeth Middleton 1. Catherine Elizabeth Middleton 2. Michael Francis Middleton 4. Peter Francis Middleton. Horst Auction Center “The Voices Of Experience” Fall 2015 Tool Sale. Saturday November 14, 2015 9:00 AM. Click here for Explanation of Grading. ![]() The Census. Unfortunately, the historical sources on women’s work are neither as complete nor as reliable as we would like. Aggregate information on the occupations of women is available only from the census, and while census data has the advantage of being comprehensive, it is not a very good measure of work done by women during the Industrial Revolution. For one thing, the census does not provide any information on individual occupations until 1. Even then the data on women’s occupations is questionable. For the 1. 84. 1 census, the directions for enumerators stated that “The professions & c. Table One illustrates the problem further; it shows the occupations of men and women recorded in the 1. These numbers suggest that female labor force participation was low, and that 4. However, economic historians have demonstrated that these numbers are misleading. First, many women who were actually employed were not listed as employed in the census. Women who appear in farm wage books have no recorded occupation in the census. At the same time, the census over- estimates participation by listing in the “domestic service” category women who were actually family members. In addition, the census exaggerates the extent to which women were concentrated in domestic service occupations because many women listed as “maids”, and included in the domestic servant category in the aggregate tables, were really agricultural workers. Table One. Occupational Distribution in the 1. Census of Great Britain. Occupational Category.
Males (thousands)Females (thousands)Percent Female. Public Administration. Armed Forces. 63. Professions. 16. 21. Domestic Services. Commercial. 91. 00. Transportation & Communications. Agriculture. 17. 88. Fishing. 36. 12. 7. Mining. 38. 31. 12. Metal Manufactures. Building & Construction. Wood & Furniture. Bricks, Cement, Pottery, Glass. Chemicals. 42. 48. Leather & Skins. Paper & Printing. Textiles. 66. 16. Clothing. 41. 84. Food, Drink, Lodging. Other. 44. 57. 51. Total Occupied. 65. Total Unoccupied. Source: B. R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1. Domestic Service. Domestic work – cooking, cleaning, caring for children and the sick, fetching water, making and mending clothing – took up the bulk of women’s time during the Industrial Revolution period. Most of this work was unpaid. Some families were well- off enough that they could employ other women to do this work, as live- in servants, as charring women, or as service providers. Live- in servants were fairly common; even middle- class families had maids to help with the domestic chores. Charring women did housework on a daily basis. In London women were paid 2s. However, a “day’s work” in washing could last 2. Other women worked as laundresses, doing the washing in their own homes. Cottage Industry. Before factories appeared, most textile manufacture (including the main processes of spinning and weaving) was carried out under the “putting- out” system. Since raw materials were expensive, textile workers rarely had enough capital to be self- employed, but would take raw materials from a merchant, spin or weave the materials in their homes, and then return the finished product and receive a piece- rate wage. This system disappeared during the Industrial Revolution as new machinery requiring water or steam power appeared, and work moved from the home to the factory. Before the Industrial Revolution, hand spinning had been a widespread female employment. It could take as many as ten spinners to provide one hand- loom weaver with yarn, and men did not spin, so most of the workers in the textile industry were women. The new textile machines of the Industrial Revolution changed that. Militaria Mart features a reputable dealer directory and resource site for collectors of militaria. 9780978417918 0978417917 Hell on Earth, Mark Tushingham Ph. 9781603961936 1603961933 Stink el Increible Nino Menguante, Megan McDonald 9780949753861 0949753866. This page is still under construction. Please call again soon. Cromwell, Central Otago. Just how or why the five of David and Elizabeth’s family came to emigrate. Wages for hand- spinning fell, and many rural women who had previously spun found themselves unemployed. In a few locations, new cottage industries such as straw- plaiting and lace- making grew and took the place of spinning, but in other locations women remained unemployed. Another important cottage industry was the pillow- lace industry, so called because women wove the lace on pins stuck in a pillow. In the late- eighteenth century women in Bedford could earn 6s. However, this industry too disappeared due to mechanization. Following Heathcote’s invention of the bobbinet machine (1. This new type of lace created a new cottage industry, that of “lace- runners” who emboidered patterns on the lace. The straw- plaiting industry employed women braiding straw into bands used for making hats and bonnets. The industry prospered around the turn of the century due to the invention of a simple tool for splitting the straw and war, which cut off competition from Italy. At this time women could earn 4s. This industry also declined, though, following the increase in free trade with the Continent in the 1. Factories. A defining feature of the Industrial Revolution was the rise of factories, particularly textile factories. Work moved out of the home and into a factory, which used a central power source to run its machines. Water power was used in most of the early factories, but improvements in the steam engine made steam power possible as well. The most dramatic productivity growth occurred in the cotton industry. The invention of James Hargreaves’ spinning jenny (1. Richard Arkwright’s “throstle” or “water frame” (1. Samuel Crompton’s spinning mule (1. Britain began to manufacture cotton cloth, and declining prices for the cloth encouraged both domestic consumption and export. Machines also appeared for other parts of the cloth- making process, the most important of which was Edmund Cartwright’s powerloom, which was adopted slowly because of imperfections in the early designs, but was widely used by the 1. While cotton was the most important textile of the Industrial Revolution, there were advances in machinery for silk, flax, and wool production as well. The advent of new machinery changed the gender division of labor in textile production. Before the Industrial Revolution, women spun yarn using a spinning wheel (or occasionally a distaff and spindle). Men didn’t spin, and this division of labor made sense because women were trained to have more dexterity than men, and because men’s greater strength made them more valuable in other occupations. In contrast to spinning, handloom weaving was done by both sexes, but men outnumbered women. Men monopolized highly skilled preparation and finishing processes such as wool combing and cloth- dressing. With mechanization, the gender division of labor changed. Women used the spinning jenny and water frame, but mule spinning was almost exclusively a male occupation because it required more strength, and because the male mule- spinners actively opposed the employment of female mule- spinners. Women mule- spinners in Glasgow, and their employers, were the victims of violent attacks by male spinners trying to reduce the competition in their occupation. While they moved out of spinning, women seem to have increased their employment in weaving (both in handloom weaving and eventually in powerloom factories). Both sexes were employed as powerloom operators. Table Two. Factory Workers in 1. Females as a Percent of the Workforce. Industry. Ages 1. Ages 1. 3- 2. 0Ages 2. All Ages. Cotton. Wool. 38. 6. 46. 2. Flax. 54. 8. 77. 3. Silk. 74. 3. 84. 3. Lace. 38. 7. 57. 4. Potteries. 38. 1. Dyehouse. 0. 0. 0. Glass. 0. 0. 0. 0. Paper- 1. 00. 0. 39. Whole Sample. 52. Source: “Report from Dr. James Mitchell to the Central Board of Commissioners, respecting the Returns made from the Factories, and the Results obtained from them.” British Parliamentary Papers, 1. XIX. Mitchell collected data from 8. Great Britain. While the highly skilled and highly paid task of mule- spinning was a male occupation, many women and girls were engaged in other tasks in textile factories. For example, the wet- spinning of flax, introduced in Leeds in 1. Girls often worked as assistants to mule- spinners, piecing together broken threads. In fact, females were a majority of the factory labor force. Table Two shows that 5. Women were widely employed in all the textile industries, and constituted the majority of workers in cotton, flax, and silk. Outside of textiles, women were employed in potteries and paper factories, but not in dye or glass manufacture. Of the women who worked in factories, 1. On average, girls earned the same wages as boys. Children’s wages rose from about 1s. Beginning at age 1. At age 3. 0, women factory workers earned only one- third as much as men. Figure One. Distribution of Male and Female Factory Employment by Age, 1. Source: “Report from Dr. James Mitchell to the Central Board of Commissioners, respecting the Returns made from the Factories, and the Results obtained from them.” British Parliamentary Papers, 1. XIX. The y- axis shows the percentage of total employment within each sex that is in that five- year age category. Figure Two. Wages of Factory Workers in 1. Source: “Report from Dr. James Mitchell to the Central Board of Commissioners, respecting the Returns made from the Factories, and the Results obtained from them.” British Parliamentary Papers, 1. XIX. Agriculture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |